Who could have predicted that sharing of leadership positions in the
legislature would turn out to be a big migraine for the All
Progressives Congress (APC) so soon after a landslide victory in the
general elections? That the APC did what has never been done in
Nigeria, a hitherto opposition, wresting power from the ruling party
through peaceful means – the power of the thumb at elections – means
that we can get things done the right way if only we want to.
But managing that success would be tested in the days to come. Almost
a month after conclusion of the National Assembly elections, the APC
is yet to come up with an agreeable zoning formula for leadership
positions in the National Assembly where it swept away the Peoples
Democratic Party (PDP) from power.
All eyes are now on the powerful National Executive Committee of the
party; the only organ of the APC that can make a definite pronouncement
on which zone will get what. In the meantime, the party’s National
Working Committee has been saddled with the responsibility of
brainstorming on the zoning proposal, which the body would present to
the NEC for ratification. It is no mean task.
Reports in the media point in the direction of the North-central for
either the Senate presidency or Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Many political watchers have argued that bequeathing these exalted
seats, especially that of the Senate president to the North-east would
be giving too much to the North, which already has the presidency. The
President-elect, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari is from Katsina State in the
North-west region.
It can be rightly argued, however, that the North has earned the
right to the position, having delivered more seats in the legislature
to the APC. On the contrary, the PDP lost most of its seats in the
North, especially the North-central where it had relative control.post by expdonaloaded.blogspot.com
States like Kogi, Kwara, Benue and Nasarawa have now joined the APC
train, shooting up the numbers of APC lawmakers in the Senate to 60,
while PDP now controls 48 seats. But the zone, which has been consistent
in producing the most legislators for the opposition (now ruling party
from May 29), has been the North-east.
Of the six-geopolitical zones, the North-east has been particularly
shortchanged in the power equation in the National Assembly. During
former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s tenure from 1999 to 2007, the
North-west maintained a grip on the speaker’s office with Salisu Buhari,
Ghali Na’Abba and Aminu Masari holding sway in succession.
After Obasanjo’s exit from power, the PDP zoned the position to the
South-west, leading to the emergence of Patricia Etteh and Dimeji
Bankole, whose tenure ended in 2011. The grip of the South-west was cut
short, following the revolt by members of the House against the zoning
arrangement and the subsequent election of Hon. Aminu Tambuwal, as
speaker of the House till date.
The North-east counted its loss in 2011 when contrary to the zoning
arrangement that would have given it the deputy speaker slot, Hon.
Emeka Ihedioha, from the South-east was elected instead alongside
Tambuwal. The region was left with no principal office in both Senate
and House of Representatives.
The deputy speaker is so far the highest position the North-east has
occupied in the National Assembly since 1999. From 2007-2011, the region
only produced former deputy speaker under Bankole, Usman Bayero
Nafada, from Gombe State.
The zone is the third most populous in Nigeria after North-west and
South-west, having the highest number of minority tribes, who have
always been schemed out and marginalised in the country’s power sharing
arrangement. It is also contending with the devastating effect of Boko
Haram insurgency, hence the need for its leaders to be rightly
positioned to bring the much-needed rehabilitation to the region.
The states of Borno and Yobe have especially been consistent since
1999 in keeping the opposition strong in the National Assembly. The zone
also has the most ranking members in the National Assembly, making it
the most qualified to produce the next president of the Senate,
according to the Rules of the Red Chamber.
In the just concluded presidential and National Assembly elections,
the North-east produced the second highest number of votes for the APC
and second highest number of federal lawmakers for the party.post by expdonaloaded.blogspot.com
It has been reported that the APC’s NWC is favourably disposed to
zoning the Senate president to the North-central but that would be
against the principle of justice and fairness. In the March 28 National
Assembly poll, the North-central produced 13 senators while the
North-west elected 14 senators. Out of the 13 senators from the
North-central, only six are ranking while the North-east has seven
ranking senators.
Moreover, since the North-central has been in the saddle since 2007,
with David Mark, completing his second term as the Senate president, it
is time to look elsewhere and, in the spirit of cohesion and sense of
unity, zone the post to the North-East which has been left out in the
cold since 2007.
Already, interested senators have since commenced lobbying of the
national leadership of the APC and are demanding that the choice of
Senate president be done in line with the Senate Standing Rules (2011,
as amended).
The Senate rules, which applied in June 2011 when Mark was re-elected
as Senate president, gives preference to any serving senator who is
re-elected to the chamber.
Based on the ranking rule, the North-east caucus has tipped Senator Ahmad Lawan for Senate president.
Senator Lawan was first elected into the House of Representatives in
1999 where he served two terms. In 2007, he was elected into the Senate
and was re-elected for a third term on March 28.
No comments:
Post a Comment