The All Progressives Congress (APC) is at crossroads over the filling
of chairmanship position of its Board of Trustees (BoT). Leaders of
the party may not publicly admit that, how much more talk about it in
the open, but that is the prevailing situation at the moment .The push for the headship of the board has been on since June. And the
campaign strategy adopted by contenders for the office has been the same
deployment of long knife against opponents without the public taking
note.
For now, key contenders for the office include former Vice President
Atiku Abubakar, former Lagos State governor , Bola Ahmed Tinubu,
erstwhile national chairman of Peoples Democratic Party(PDP), Chief Audu
Ogbeh and former Interim national chairman of APC, Chief Bisi Akande.
The earlier calculation was that the board of trustees of the party
would be inaugurated soon after the general election or at worst, after
the inauguration of President Muhammadu Buhari. But that was not to be.
No thanks to the crisis that engulfed the National Assembly. The crisis
dealt a huge blow to the unity of the party . Its leaders who played
divergent roles in the National Assembly leadership standoff became
foes. A new alignment emerged. The issue of BoT and its chairmanship
were temporarily brushed aside. Though the National Executive Committee
(NEC) of the party, in its meeting soon after the inauguration had
approved proposals made for the inclusion of some members of the
party’s BoT as submitted by the APC National Legal Adviser, Dr. Muiz
Banire, the infighting amongst leaders of the party was not to allow the
chairmanship of the board to emerge.
Article 13.2 (X) of the APC Constitution (October 2014 as amended),
deals with the powers of the BoT, stipulates: “The Board of Trustees
shall elect its chairman, deputy chairman, secretary and other officers
as it deems necessary, and formulate its own rules and procedures to
regulate its meetings and activities.”
“The way things turned out in the National Assembly on June 9 affected
the unity of the party. Even though we pretend outside , the party is
split today . Some tendencies have emerged . The development has stalled
the emergence of our BoT chairman”, a member of the National Working
Committee (NWC) who does not want his name mentioned said.
The issues
On the surface, the contention over who leads the BoT of the party looks
ordinary and harmless but the truth is that it is not. Agreed that BoT
of any party is only an advisory body, it goes beyond that. The battle
over the chairmanship of APC trustees board is about stealth move to
have a grip on the structure of the party ahead of 2019 . Former Vice
President , Atiku who does not hide the fact that his eyes are still
fixed on the presidency wants to use the platform of the APC board to
strengthen his clout and influence in the party.
“The party official said “Atiku wants to be in a position where he
cannot be ignored by anybody in the party and in the government. He
knows how important that office is, he knows he can use that to
infiltrate and control most members.”
The former Vice President is believed to have moved in opposite
direction with Tinubu in the National Assembly leadership tussle. That
has further strained their relationship.
The former Lagos state governor and national leader of APC knows the
mission of Atiku and is doing everything within his power to torpedo it.
Tinubu’s shadow , at the moment, is looming large in the party . Take
or leave it ,he has an overwhelming hold on majority of the NWC members
and stretching his influence to a critical area like the BoT will be to
his great advantage.
He is aware that Atiku has control of the leadership of the National
Assembly as both the Senate President , Bukola Saraki and Speaker House
of Representatives , Yakubu Dogara were installed by his group. Tinubu
knows the significance of this. He also understands the consequence of
allowing the man’s shadow to strayed into the party’s key arm like the
BoT. That is why he is fighting hard to checkmate him.
Even if at the end of the day Tinubu does not go for the BoT
chairmanship, he would prefer his acolyte to there . And that is why
Akande is pushing hard for the office.
At the heat of the National Assembly crisis , Akande , working with
Tinubu fired a salvo to the Atiku camp. The motive was to destabilize
the camp and keep it in check.
In a provocative statement on June 28, He claimed that the members of
the APC, who left the PDP, came into the ruling party with vested
interests, which he claimed were fuelling the APC crisis.
Hear him , “What began as political patronages, which was to be shared
into APC membership spread among ethnic zones, religious faiths, (as
well as) political rankings and experiences, has now become so
complicated that the sharing has to be done by and among PDP leadership,
together with cohorts of former New PDP affiliations in the APC, by and
among gangs against Buhari’s presidency, and certain APC legislators
and party members who dance round the crisis arena to pick some crumbs.
“After the elections, which saw the APC to victory all round, a meeting
was reported to have been held by certain old and new PDP leaders in
(former National Chairman of PDP) Kawu Baraje’s house in Abuja to review
what should be their share in this new Buhari’s government and resolved
to seek collaboration with the PDP with a view to hijacking the
National Assembly and, having got rid of Goodluck Jonathan, with an
ultimate aim of resuscitating the PDP as their future political
platform.”
Baraje did not take the attack kindly. He returned the diatribe to the
former APC interim boss . He described Akande’s claims as unfortunate
and expressed disappointed that he would make such claims.
Also , the APC national chairman, John Odigie-Oyegun, Saraki, Dogara,
the Arewa Consultative Forum and the northern caucus of the party, among
several others, tackled Akande over the comment .In the case of Audu
Ogbe , nothing much has streamed out of his table . He knows that his
fate hangs, more or less, on the outcome of the duel between Atiku and
Tinubu. For now he is only disturbed that the BoT chairmanship issue is
allowed to linger and stroud in uncertainty .
He said “ “It isn’t the constitution that is the real problem.
Constitutions are run by human beings. We have our constitution; we have
a certain understanding among ourselves about what we should do and
shouldn’t do. I think there are some managerial lapses somewhere.
“For instance, we have not yet formally inaugurated our Board of
Trustees. What are we waiting for? This is the kind of crisis that the
Board of Trustees should have taken over and resolved and not the
National Working Committee or the National Executive Committee of the
party. Why is the Board of Trustees not in place?”
North, South debate
As expected, diverse arguments are being put forward by different
tendencies and power blocs in the APC regarding the BoT chairmanship.
For the Atiku men, the position, without debate, should be ceded to the
North. They argue that the practice in other parties is that when the
national chairman is from the South, the position of the BoT chairman is
held by the North and vice versa.
Tinubu’s loyalists are not swayed by the argument. They insist that the
focus should be handing the baton to somebody who has the capacity to
strengthen the unity of the party rather than dwelling on his ethnic
origin . Apart from that, they argue that both the President, Senate
President , speaker of the House of Representatives and other key
government functionaries are from the North .
“We are asking for a balance , we are asking for that move that will
help the unity of our great party rather than divide it. We are
insisting that the chairmanship of the BoT of our party must come from
the south”, a top member of the party said .
The two political blocs are unlikely to give up their stand on this matter.
The APC chieftain captured the development thus “we are in a country
where people pay much attention to issues relating to tribe. I know that
we will sort out our differences on this matter. There is nothing wrong
in the North insisting that the office must be zoned to the region .
There is also nothing wrong in the South asking that it comes to the
region. For me, the party is bigger than any individual. What is good
for the party will prevail at the end”.
Another chieftain of the party, Osita Okechukwu does not differ in his
position on the matter from colleagues. According to him it is
surprising that some members of the party are losing sleeping thinking
about the zone or region that should produce the chairman of the BoT. He
claimed that the party knows how to overcome any of its challenges .
He said “We have a special way of crossing every bridge, this one will
not be different. i dont think it will be right for anybody to lose
sleep over who becomes our BoT chairman . The good news is that non of
those people being rumoured as having the ambitiion to lead the board
that is a political neophyte. They all know when to draw a line between
their ambition and what the party needs”.
Of course several people are likely to disagree with Okechukwu but nobody can dismiss his views as hogwash.
Sure. apostles of North and South sharing formula in the distribution of
top offices in the party hinge their argument on what is obtained in
parties like the PDP. They may not like many things about the rival
party but they are unlkely to shift their ground that PDP needs to be
emulated on this.
Presidency’s master stroke
Although the focus has been on Atiku and Tinubu in the whole thing, the
political chess game has clearly transcended the two figures. President
Buhari, expectedly, factoring the 2019 and the possibility of seeking a
second term, is clearing all possible road blocks.
The appointment of Engr Babachir David Lawal as the Secretary of the
Government of the Federation (SGF) may seem innocuous, some individuals
believe that it was a master stroke pulled by the presidency to keep
Atiku out of the BoT chairmanship race and to a large extent, reduce his
visibility in the party. Notable chieftains of APC feel this way.
This is the reason they hold such stand. Lawal hails from Adamawa, the
same state Atiku comes from. By giving the top office to an indigene of
the state, Atiku will be morally constrained from asking for BoT
chairmanship.
This is how a top notcher of the party puts it “ the ambition of Atiku
to emerge the Chairman, Board of Trustees of APC technically came to an
end on the day the President appointed Lawal as SGF. Nobody will accept
that Adamawa should produce both the SGF and BoT chairman. I think the
President deliberately did that to reduce his influence in the party and
stop him from possibly becoming an obstacle to him in 2019.”
He added “ with this appointment, Lawal will become the leader of the
party in the state. I think the Tinubu camp will be happy with the
appointment. But Atiku is not someone anybody can pocket, we expect him
to come up with a new strategy . But it is a masterstroke pulled by
President Buhari. I can tell you that that is the general thinking in
the APC. And that is the whole truth about Lawal’s appointment”.
Certainly, Atiku may have also read the same handwriting on the wall.
Whether the Tinubu camp is laughing last on the BoT chairmanship battle
will be seen, sooner than later.
No comments:
Post a Comment